Creative Director - Open SEa
As the world's first and largest NFT marketplace, OpenSea is pioneering a new frontier where art, games, technology and commerce converge in fascinating and unprecedented ways. Our platform empowers millions of creators, collectors and developers to easily showcase, discover, buy and sell unique digital items.
We’re a team of rigorous problem solvers, visionary futurists, proactive doers and effective communicators. As a remote-first company, we enable our team members to work from anywhere, while making time to come together as a team to collaborate and connect in person throughout the year.
OpenSea is seeking a Creative Director who will take ownership of the creative vision and execution across all touchpoints, from product design to marketing campaigns. You’ll play a pivotal role in defining our brand identity, ensuring consistency, and crafting experiences that delight users and drive engagement. This is a hands-on role in a fast-paced, dynamic environment, requiring you to collaborate across teams and adapt to the evolving needs of a startup. You'll collaborate closely with Marketing to infuse our strategies with fresh, interactive expressions that captivate the NFT community. If you're passionate about pushing creative boundaries we invite you to navigate this thrilling phase of our journey with us.
Responsibilities:
Set the creative vision for the company, aligning with business goals and consumer insights.
Develop and execute multi-channel creative campaigns that not only resonate with the NFT community but also elevate the OpenSea brand to a new standard of excellence.
Lead the evolution of our brand's identity, ensuring it aligns with the latest trends in the crypto and NFT spaces and captures the essence of OpenSea 2.0.
Coordinate and define overarching creative strategies that seamlessly integrate with marketing, social media, and other communication channels, creating a unified and dynamic brand experience.
Proactively adapt creative strategies to align with industry developments, leveraging emerging opportunities to keep OpenSea at the forefront of the NFT landcsape.
Collaborate with product and engineering teams to design user-centered digital experiences (e.g., websites, apps, and interfaces).
Desired Experience:
Demonstrated leadership as a Creative Director or similar role within the web3, or NFT industries, with a history of successfully guiding brands through significant transformations.
Expertise in orchestrating integrated marketing and creative strategies across various platforms, ensuring all elements of the brand’s presence are cohesive and compelling.
Exceptional ability to conceptualize and implement innovative branding and narrative techniques that tell the story of our brand and engage our community.
Comfort with a dynamic, fast-paced startup environment, where you will not just direct but also do hands-on creation and execution of projects
The base salary for this full-time position, which spans across multiple internal levels depending on qualifications, ranges between $215,000 to $305,000 plus benefits & equity.
If you don't think you meet all of the criteria below but still are interested in the job, please apply. Nobody checks every box, and we're looking for someone who is excited to join the team.
#LI-Remote
Benefits & Perks
🏥 Health Benefits: We cover 100% Dental/Vision/Medical for employees and 80% for dependents
🌴 Flexible Time Off Policy: Our flexible time off policy is aimed at letting our employees take as much time off as they'd like to refresh so long as it doesn't interfere with their ability to meet their goals and contribute effectively to company velocity
👶 Parental Leave: 16 Weeks of Paid Parental Bonding & up to 8 additional weeks for the birthing parent
💛 Mental Health: We offer access to Spring Health, covering 8 therapy & 8 coaching sessions per year
📅 11 Company Holidays
🏦 Fidelity 401K Plan
📱 Internet/Mobile Reimbursement Plan
🧘 Reimbursement or Monthly Snack Delivery
✈ Company & Team retreats to get together for fun and collaboration
☕ Team Member Co-Working and Gathering Expense
🖥 MacBook Pro & WFH Stipend to make sure you are set up for success
🌯 Weekly $50 Uber Eats credit
By clicking submit an application below, you consent to our use and processing of your data as described in our Candidate Privacy Notice.
Please be aware that OpenSea participates in E-Verify to confirm employment eligibility.
Apply for this Job
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Powered by
Privacy PolicySecurityVulnerability Disclosure
Founder Ownership Report 2025
Solo founders are stepping up: The percentage of all startups incorporated on Carta that are led by a solo founder has more than doubled over the past decade, reaching 35% in 2024. Over this same span, startups with three, four, and five founders have become less prevalent.
Top Lean AI Native Companies Leaderboard
If you extend this argument to the limit, you end up with individuals running entire companies by themselves. The share of solo-founder startups has almost doubled in the last few years, and the first examples of businesses with a handful of employees generating hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue have emerged. Henri Shi, who spent nearly a decade growing super.com into a $150m ARR business, is now tracking his progress towards Altman’s one-person billion dollar company goal on a public leaderboard. He reports an average of $2.8 million in revenue per employee, coincidentally the same as Apple, the most valuable publicly traded US company of the past two decades. Companies like Midjourney, with its 40 employees and $500m of yearly revenues, represent a structural shift, not an anomaly. These companies are now full of high-agency individuals carrying the work of several teams, and are easily competing with much larger companies.
Agency Is Eating the World
Pirate Wires
Technology
Politics
Culture
Technology
Newsletters
Subscribe
Sign In
Subscribe
Sign In
Newsletters
Gift a Sub 🎁
Store
Pirate Wires
Technology
Politics
Culture
Search
About
Writers
Podcast
Careers
Agency Is Eating the World
a solo operator can now launch a $1b business powered by ai. our economy's critical dividing line is no longer skill or education — it's will.
Gian Segato
Apr 21, 2025
Subscribe to The Industry
Your email here...
Sign up for free
Gian Segato is a founding data scientist and engineer at Replit, the AI coding agent that allows anyone (even non-developers) to create a bespoke app instantly via natural language prompting. It’s now one of the fastest-growing products and developer communities in history. Before Replit, Segato founded Uniwhere, the first mobile app to manage college life end-to-end in Italy. He’s also an occasional angel investor.
--
In 2023, Sam Altman famously said, “There’ll soon be a one-person billion-dollar company.” Two years later, we’re watching his prediction unfold — and not simply because of AI, but because of the individuals who are wielding it.
A new breed of companies is emerging: lean, unconventional, and wildly successful. They generate hundreds of millions of dollars yet have no sales teams, no marketing departments, no formal HR, not even vertically specialized engineers. They’re led by a handful of people doing the work of hundreds, leveraging machines to scale their impact.
For years, we feared automation would replace humans. But as AI reshapes the economy, it’s becoming clear that far from replacing human ingenuity, AI has amplified it. The critical dividing line in our economy is no longer simply education or specialization, but rather agency itself: the raw determination to make things happen without waiting for permission.
Agency
The word agency is thrown around a lot these days. It’s not always clear what it means.
Many people in tech today, myself included, are working to create digital systems capable of interacting with and adapting to the external environment to achieve specific outcomes. We call these programs “agents.” A legal agent might autonomously scan court documents and compile a legal strategy; a financial agent might continuously monitor market conditions and dynamically adjust pricing or investment strategies. For the past three years, I’ve been part of the core team behind Replit, a coding agent that writes, runs, and deploys software programs autonomously.
Despite its status as standard industry nomenclature, I’ve grown to dislike the term “agent.” I find it inaccurate. When building agents, we’re giving programs everything except agency. The appeal of these tools lies in their combination of capability, maneuverability, and predictable behavior — they execute complex tasks while remaining fundamentally responsive to instructions. When, some time ago, a few companies started offering more independent coding models, customers didn’t like them. The most successful AI products today are reactive, not proactive, and don’t exhibit genuine independence, primarily because that’s what customers want: programs that listen when told what to do.
High-agency people don’t.
True agency is an unruly psychological trait. It’s the willingness to act without explicit validation, instruction, or even permission. It’s the meme “you can just do things,” knowing that “you can poke life, and something will pop out the other side.” It’s a venture capitalist with no academic background founding the most important AI lab in history; a gaming entrepreneur creating a $30 billion military company; a fintech CEO birthing the private space industry out of thin air. True agency involves defiance, improvisation, instinct, and often irrationality.
You don’t need to be in tech to have high agency. Yet you’ll find most of these people there, as they naturally gravitate toward low-structure, high-impact environments — namely, startups.
While driven individuals capable of making things happen have always existed, their bandwidth has historically been limited. It’s impossible to scale impact entirely alone. We live in a complex world: to accomplish anything significant, you still need to specialize at some point, which takes time. High-agency people aiming to achieve their goals still need to hire specialists or spend years selecting and mastering a discipline.
When I founded my previous company a decade ago, it took me nine months to go from idea to working prototype — nine months spent essentially learning the basics required to build a digital product. And yet, this effort still didn’t put me anywhere near the proficiency of a professional software developer, designer, or marketer. Becoming an expert takes time.
Specialization is a necessary precondition for success, making it a form of local monopoly. We live in a homeostatic equilibrium: even the most intelligent and driven people can’t possibly perform every job simultaneously. Stable ecological systems sustain themselves long-term precisely because the apex predator can’t be everywhere at once.
This dynamic explains why being more skilled and educated confers a persistent advantage, and why on average our society favors credentials over outcomes. The optimal strategy is typically to follow the lead, stay in your lane, do your homework, and achieve top marks. To get a job, keep that job, specialize, and climb the ladder. There’s a reason college tuition has outpaced inflation multiple times over. People hope it will help them develop specialized skills, creating their own form of vertical monopoly within the workforce.
We don’t live in a world that’s kind to generalists.
Well, until AI, that is.
A phase shift
We’re now facing a rupture, a phase transition. AI has eroded the value of specialization because, for many tasks, achieving the outcome of several years of experience now takes a $20 ChatGPT subscription.
If a decade ago it took me nine months to gain enough experience to ship a single prototype, now it takes just one week to build a state-of-the-art platform ready to be shipped — a project once only achievable by a full team of professionals.
Skeptics will push back against this techno-optimism, arguing that AI is sloppy, intrinsically probabilistic and prone to mistakes. Build using AI, the story goes, and things will sure enough eventually break: you need an expert to know when to trust the machine.
I understand, but disagree.
While it’s true that specialization hasn’t become irrelevant, it no longer matters indiscriminately and uniformly. I expect a bimodal-shaped distribution of AI deployment, depending on how comfortable we are — as a society — with risk.
In industries where untrained people equipped with imperfect AI models could make costly mistakes, we are going to see demand for specialized human accountability. This will include sectors such as defense, healthcare, space exploration, biological research, and AI advancement itself — all domains where the variance of prediction models is higher than the acceptable risk threshold. Wherever mistakes can kill and AI can’t prove to be virtually all-knowing, we can expect regulation to enforce natural barriers, and the need to hire experts. It’s similar to why we continue to require human pilots despite having the technological capacity for autonomous flight. Sometimes, we just want the ability to point a finger.
However, for most jobs this is not true. Wherever we are okay with “trying again” after getting a bad AI generation, we will see market disruption. Data science, marketing, financial modeling, education, graphic design, counseling, and architecture will all experience an influx of non-specialized, high-agency individuals. Sure, machines will keep making mistakes, but their rate of improvement has been astronomical, and will only continue to delay the point at which generalists feel the need to hire experts. Three years ago AI could simply auto-complete small code snippets. Two years ago it started fixing broken programs. Last year it began creating new projects from scratch. It now can autonomously understand large projects created by thousands of human developers, and be used even by non-professionals.
The game has shifted, and the winning strategy with it. It’s no longer about understanding specialized details; it’s about grasping the high-level global picture. It’s less about knowing how to patch a system and more about knowing that it needs to be patched. It’s more about architecture, and less about implementation. Precisely where generalists thrive.
For these individuals, boundaries between professions are beginning to blur and overlap. I’ve begun to see product managers developing business financial models; designers writing commercial ads; barbershops building custom booking systems; and restaurant owners creating advanced pricing tools. Even domains seemingly far from tech, like agriculture, are beginning to see this impact, with farmers building crop tracking systems. These people always had it in them to do these things. The key difference is that it no longer takes years to learn how.
If you extend this argument to the limit, you end up with individuals running entire companies by themselves. The share of solo-founder startups has almost doubled in the last few years, and the first examples of businesses with a handful of employees generating hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue have emerged. Henri Shi, who spent nearly a decade growing super.com into a $150m ARR business, is now tracking his progress towards Altman’s one-person billion dollar company goal on a public leaderboard. He reports an average of $2.8 million in revenue per employee, coincidentally the same as Apple, the most valuable publicly traded US company of the past two decades. Companies like Midjourney, with its 40 employees and $500m of yearly revenues, represent a structural shift, not an anomaly. These companies are now full of high-agency individuals carrying the work of several teams, and are easily competing with much larger companies.
This is the unraveling of credentialism. Having an edge in the market is no longer about knowing how to do something very specific very well; it’s about being biased toward making it happen.
A new world
My entire world model has collapsed into a single bit: agency, or no agency.
The transition will take time, and it will be far from painless. Institutions built around credentials won’t go gently into the good night. Middle management will fight to keep headcount because it will take time to shift away from the idea that more people working on a problem signals a more important problem. Schools and colleges will take a while to adapt their teaching methods and content. Only bottom-up market competition will force change.
Structure isn’t always bad. One-person companies come with high chaos potential, and cascading errors can be hard to contain at scale. A solo operator lacks the redundancy of a team — when the AI fumbles, there’s no safety net, and small mistakes like mishandled tax compliance can snowball into audits, bug fixes, social media rants, and refund chaos. Yet, these entrepreneurs will still prove to be mighty competitive forces that big firms can’t ignore.
The good news is that having high agency is an internal state of mind, and it can be absorbed. It means freeing oneself from artificial constraints and defying them. It’s Morpheus challenging Neo in The Matrix: “Do you think that’s air you’re breathing now?” The limitations we’ve accepted as natural — degrees, credentials, specialized skills, years of experience — are no longer the barriers we believed they were to making things happen.
Like Neo, the hardest part is simply believing we’re free to jump.
—Gian Segato
Subscribe to The Industry
Your email here...
Sign up for free
0 free articles left
1 Like
- Comments
Share
Please sign-in to comment
There are no comments yet. Be the first!
Continue Reading
LLM Applications I Want To SeeMar 13
ideas for actually making practical use of large language models
Sarah Constantin
DeepSeek Was InevitableJan 31
a cheap, open-source AI was bound to arrive. history tells us why.
Steven Sinofsky
Infinity EnginesMar 12
an imaginative portal into the future of ai-powered video games
G. B. Rango
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
X (Twitter)
Facebook
Instagram
RSS
Newsletter
Advertise
All rights reserved. © 2025 Pirate Wires
Bluebirds capital
Uses notion for a landing page. saved in HD under /bluebirdscap
first PhD thesis written on generative art?
p282, Generative Computergraphik - Georg Nees, 1969. Likely the first PhD thesis written on generative art. Would love to read an EN translation.
👁↓👁
https://archive.org/details/generative_computergraphik/generative_computergraphik__georg_nees__2006_reprint/page/282/mode/1up
Life's work.
What you're good at. What you love.
What the world needs.
What you can get paid for.